The Impact of Workers’ Rights on Union Membership and Wages in U.S.
In recent years, a new facet of division has emerged across the United States: union membership. As the landscape of workers’ rights continues to evolve, a striking contrast has developed between states that protect collective bargaining and those that enforce “right to work” laws. A recent report by the Illinois Economic Policy Institute and the Project for Middle Class Renewal at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign highlights this growing divide, revealing that states with protective labor laws are experiencing increased union membership and higher wages, while their counterparts face declining union representation and stagnant pay.
The Landscape of Union Membership
The report draws attention to a significant disparity between the 26 states that have implemented right-to-work laws—primarily located in the South and Central U.S.—and the 24 states along with Washington D.C. that uphold collective bargaining rights. In right-to-work states, union density stands at a mere 5.1%. In stark contrast, states that support collective bargaining see a union density of 14.2%. This stark difference not only underscores the varying attitudes towards unions but also suggests broader implications for economic well-being and worker protections.
Implications for Workers’ Rights
The implications of these findings are profound. In states where unions are supported, workers enjoy greater job security, better wages, and improved working conditions. Collective bargaining enables workers to negotiate terms that reflect their needs and aspirations, leading to a more equitable workplace environment. Conversely, in right-to-work states, unions often face significant challenges in organizing and maintaining membership. The erosion of collective bargaining rights results in weaker protections for workers, ultimately leading to stagnation or decline in wages.
This dynamic is particularly troubling when considering the rising cost of living across many parts of the country. As inflation continues to impact household budgets, the importance of strong labor representation becomes even more pronounced. Unionized workers tend to earn higher wages than their non-union counterparts; thus, a decline in union membership in certain regions can exacerbate economic inequality.
The Regional Divide: A Closer Look
The geographical divide is not merely an abstract concept; it reflects deeply ingrained cultural attitudes towards labor rights and economic equity. States with robust protections for unions—often located on the coasts or in northern regions—tend to prioritize worker advocacy as part of their political agendas. On the other hand, southern and central states adopting right-to-work laws often emphasize individualism over collective action, fostering an environment where workers may feel isolated in their struggles.
This divergence raises questions about what future labor relations might look like in America. Will we see a resurgence in pro-labor policies as workers demand more from their employers? Or will anti-union sentiments continue to gain traction in regions resistant to collective bargaining?
Right-to-Work Laws
Right-to-work laws are designed to give workers the freedom to choose whether or not to pay union dues. Proponents argue that these laws promote individual choice and attract businesses by creating a more flexible labor market. However, critics contend that such legislation undermines unions by depleting their financial resources, ultimately weakening their ability to negotiate effectively for better wages and working conditions.
According to the AFL-CIO, the largest labor federation in the United States, evidence suggests that workers in right-to-work states earn approximately 7% less in wages when adjusted for local cost-of-living differences. This wage gap highlights a troubling trend: as RTW laws proliferate, the financial security of American workers diminishes.
In addition to lower wages, workers in right-to-work states also face higher instances of discrimination. The AFL-CIO reports that these states experience an average of 36% more discrimination charges filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). This alarming statistic raises concerns about workplace equality and the protections afforded to employees under RTW regimes. With weaker unions, workers may lack the support needed to address discriminatory practices effectively.
The Janus v. AFSCME Decision and Collective Bargaining Rights
The landscape of labor rights was further altered by the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2018 ruling in Janus v. AFSCME. This landmark decision stripped public sector workers across all 50 states of their collective bargaining rights, reinforcing the challenges faced by unions operating in right-to-work environments. By making it easier for employees to opt out of paying dues, the ruling has exacerbated resource depletion within unions—compounding existing issues related to wage stagnation and worker protections.
Contrastingly, states that uphold collective bargaining rights have seen a resurgence in union membership. In 2024 alone, these states added nearly 10,000 new union members—a stark contrast to the loss of 200,000 members reported in right-to-work states during the same period. Notably, Illinois stands out as a prime example of how protective measures can foster union growth.
Following Illinois’ constitutional amendment in 2022 that guarantees collective bargaining rights while banning right-to-work laws, the state welcomed an influx of 27,000 new union members by 2024. This remarkable increase has elevated Illinois’ unionization rate to an impressive 13.1%. In fact, between 2022 and 2024 alone, Illinois organized more members—18,300—than it had in the previous seven years combined.
The benefits associated with strong union presence extend beyond mere membership numbers. The report indicates that union members in Illinois are statistically more likely—by 8.3%—to own homes compared to non-union members. They are also 5.2% more likely to have health insurance coverage and exhibit lower reliance on government assistance programs like Medicaid and SNAP food benefits by one to four percentage points. These findings illustrate how strong unions not only enhance individual livelihoods but also contribute positively to broader economic stability.
The Resurgence of Union Membership
In 2023, Michigan made headlines by repealing its “right to work” law, a significant policy shift that has sparked renewed interest in unionization across the state. The results were striking: nearly 15,000 new union members joined Michigan’s labor force between 2023 and 2024. This surge underscores the broader implications of labor policies on workers’ rights and collective bargaining power. As the conversation around unionization gains momentum nationwide, recent developments—including the reintroduction of the nationwide Right to Unionize Act—highlight the critical relationship between labor laws, economic stability, and democratic engagement.
The repeal of right-to-work laws is a pivotal factor in Michigan’s labor landscape. Right-to-work laws often weaken unions by allowing workers to benefit from union negotiations without contributing dues. This system can lead to underfunded unions and diminished bargaining power. By eliminating these laws, Michigan has positioned itself as a state that supports collective bargaining, resulting in a notable increase in union membership.
Frank Manzo, co-author of a report from the Illinois Economic Policy Institute, emphasizes that despite challenges like the Janus decision—which undermined public sector unions—unions are thriving in states that protect collective bargaining rights. Manzo’s insights reveal a crucial narrative: when states foster an environment conducive to union organization, workers tend to unite more effectively. In contrast, states with restrictive labor laws see a decline in union density and worker organization.
The resurgence of union membership in Michigan coincides with broader national efforts to strengthen workers’ rights. Recently, Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren and California Representative Brad Sherman reintroduced the nationwide Right to Unionize Act. This bill aims to invalidate right-to-work laws across the United States, seeking to create an environment where workers can organize freely without fear of repercussions or financial disincentives.
The timing of this legislative push is critical. According to Manzo, support for unions remains robust among Americans—approximately seven out of ten people approve of unions. Moreover, millions express a desire to join unions or organize their workplaces if afforded the opportunity. These statistics reflect a growing recognition of the importance of collective bargaining not only for individual workers but also for economic prosperity as a whole.
Suggested article: Amazon Faces Backlash After Firing Unionized Drivers in Queens
The Interplay Between Labor Movements and Democracy
Dr. Robert Bruno, another co-author of the aforementioned report and director of the Project for Middle Class Renewal, posits that the health of labor movements is intrinsically linked to both economic prosperity and democratic values. He articulates that attacking unions equates to undermining democracy itself; when workers are stripped of their collective voice, it diminishes their ability to influence both workplace conditions and broader societal issues.
This connection between labor rights and democracy is particularly salient as we observe increasing polarization around issues related to worker organization. As Dr. Bruno suggests, when laws and political climates actively dissuade or obstruct union formation, it is not surprising that we witness declines in union membership.
Suggested article: Be your own boss, not someone else’s employee
Conclusion: Bridging the Gap
As we reflect on these findings, it becomes clear that addressing this growing divide is essential for fostering a more equitable society. Policymakers must recognize the importance of supporting workers’ rights through legislation that protects collective bargaining while promoting fair labor practices nationwide.
For individuals concerned about these issues, engaging with local labor organizations or advocating for pro-union policies can make a meaningful difference in shaping the future landscape of work in America.
